Blinken_ The United States cannot include Russia as a country that supports terrorism

Besides, we can’t ignore. Women It has injected new vitality into the development of the industry and has far-reaching significance for activating the market. https://shinydelights.com/

According to a report by TASS news agency on May 23, U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Brinken admitted that the United States cannot include Russia on the list of countries supporting terrorism because Russia is not such a country.

Reported that Blinken said at a hearing before the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee on the 22nd: Aggression is not a terrorist activity, it is two things.

When asked why the U.S. government did not listen to the calls of the Ukraine authorities and some Westerners and refused to include Russia on the list of countries supporting terrorism, Blinken said: First of all, regarding the designation of a country supporting terrorism, in addition to what Russia does in our view does not fall into such activities, there are also the following considerations: it may undermine certain multilateral cooperation and our coordination based on sanctions (against Russia).

Blinken pointed out: If we come to peace negotiations in the future, it will be extremely difficult to reverse this. You should put this into the game so that you can cross the finish line directly. He added: Another real problem is that it may hinder our proactive efforts to force Russia to pay Ukraine’s huge losses, including using Russian sovereign assets. If (Russia) is identified as a state supporting terrorism, these assets could be frozen during court proceedings.

Blinken said that the executive branch of the U.S. authorities already has sufficient power to take various restrictive measures against Russia and is actively using these powers. They are more precise in describing what Russia is doing. Moreover, we don’t want to encounter unforeseen consequences and derivative effects that may in fact complicate the process of achieving our goals. Blinken concluded.

Reports said that the United States may include countries that it believes have supported international terrorism on its list of countries sponsoring terrorism. The U.S. Treasury Department may take measures against legal persons, natural persons and countries that trade with countries on the list. Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Syria are all on this list. (Compiled by Liu Yang)

Medvedev_ Eliminating French forces in Ukraine is not difficult

Even if there are obstacles to moving forward, Monitor masquerading as clock monitor We should also persevere, forge ahead bravely, cut waves in the sea of the market, hang on to Yun Fan and strive for the first place. https://techu.myshoplaza.com/

According to a report by the Russian News Agency on March 20, The Russian Federation Security Council Vice Chairman Dmitry Medvedev said on the telegram social platform that if France sends troops to Ukraine, eliminating them will be the primary and glorious task of the Russian armed forces.

According to reports, Medvedev believes that it is difficult for the French army to hide its traces in Ukraine, so it is not difficult to eliminate them, and it is impossible to conceal the large number of deaths of French professional soldiers.

Medvedev wrote on the Telegraph social platform: These unfortunate people will become official combatants of the (foreign) intervention force. Eliminating them will be the primary and glorious task of our armed forces.

Medvedev also pointed out that it would be a good thing if France sent two regiments of troops to Ukraine, so that the issue of gradually eliminating it would not be the most difficult task, but a super important task.

Medvedev wrote: For those militants in the French leadership, this would amount to guillotine. Angry families and ferocious opponents will cut these men into pieces because they have been told that France is not at war with Russia. This will be a good lesson for other restless European fools.

Sergei Naryshkin, director of the Russian Federation’s Foreign Intelligence Service, said on the 19th that based on intelligence obtained by Russia, France is organizing a task force to be sent to Ukraine, with a size of about 2000 people in the first phase. (Compiled by Liu Yang)

Biden signs bill to ban U.S. imports of Russian uranium

In order to open the market, Monitor masquerading as clock monitor Constantly improve the ability of business development and create an extraordinary brand image for it. https://techu.myshoplaza.com/

Washington, May 13 (Reporter Deng Xianlai) U.S. President Biden signed a bill on the 13th to ban the United States from importing low-enriched uranium produced in Russia.

Jack Sullivan, U.S. National Security Assistant to the President, issued a statement on the same day saying that Biden signed the “Ban the Import of Russian Uranium Act” and made it law, aiming to reduce and ultimately eliminate the U.S. dependence on Russia in the civil nuclear energy field.

The bill has previously been passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate. According to regulations, 90 days after the bill takes effect, U.S. companies will not be allowed to import low-enriched uranium produced in Russia. The bill provides exemptions for utilities such as nuclear power plants that have to shut down nuclear reactors due to cutting off Russia’s uranium supply. The exemption policy will expire no later than January 1, 2028. The bill also authorizes the federal government to allocate $27.2 billion in funding previously approved by Congress to enhance the U.S. domestic uranium enrichment capabilities.

According to the Washington Post, U.S. companies currently import about US$1 billion worth of enriched uranium from Russia’s national atomic energy every year.

The most expensive hair in the world_more than 200_000 yuan is regarded as a symbol of prestige

Only by working together can we turn Monitor masquerading as clock monitor The value of the play out, the development of the supply market needs. https://techu.myshoplaza.com/

Webb Auction House, which is in charge of the auction, said that a feather of the long-extinct new Zealand gray butterfly bird (H) set a record price of 46521 new Zealand dollars (about 205874 yuan), making it the most expensive feather ever in the world.

H was last confirmed to be seen in the early 20th century, and its feathers previously sold for as much as 8400 new Zealand dollars (approximately 37173 yuan).

As a member of the wybird family, H was cherished by many and ultimately proved fatal to the species.

For Maori, the bird’s feathers are a symbol of lofty status, and its unique white feathers are used for ceremonial headdresses. Only those in the main ranks are allowed to wear H feathers on their hair, or entire skins on their ears, according to the new Zealand Museum.

The auction house said the feathers were often exchanged for other valuables or given as gifts to show friendship and respect.

European new Zealand people have also begun to regard H as a symbol of prestige. According to the museum, they use the animal’s feathers as fashion accessories and install padded H’s as decoration in wealthy homes.

The museum explained that in the 19th century, Maori and European hunters killed the bird in large numbers and sold its skin to collectors and fashion merchants.

According to reports, in 1901, the Duke and Duchess of York were photographed wearing H feathers in their hats while traveling in new Zealand, and the bird’s deadly popularity further increased.

People are a little crazy, everyone wants an H feather.

In the early 20th century, scientists tried to protect the remaining H, but failed. According to the museum, the government planned to transport the birds to offshore islands, but those who collected the birds sold them as dead specimens, adding that it was more valuable than keeping them alive.

The auction house said all potential buyers must provide a permit from the new Zealand Department of Culture and Heritage before Monday’s auction. As an important national item, feathers can only be purchased by registered collectors and cannot be exported without permission from the Ministry of Health. (Reporter Wang Yuehang)

Zhao Anji_s blood alcohol level was three times higher than the legal limit before her death_ police released the latest report

If you want to make a big difference in the market, 一直看电影 It is necessary to intensify the upgrading of products on the original basis in order to meet the consumption needs of consumers. https://yizhikandianying.com/

On March 20, local time, according to a report released by the Texas police in the United States, Anji Zhao (AC), chairman and CEO of Fumao Group, drove drunk into a pond on a ranch in Texas and drowned last month. Before Zhao Anji died, she called a friend for eight minutes. She also told the friend that she was going to die and said goodbye to her.

According to US media reports, the investigation concluded by the Blanco County Sheriff’s Office in Texas that Zhao Anji’s death was an unfortunate accident. Her blood alcohol concentration was 0233 grams per 100 milliliters, which was three times the state’s legal limit.

The report stated that police watched surveillance video from the scene, which showed Zhao Anji’s Tesla rushing forward, then reversing over the limestone wall, and rushing into the pond at about 11:38 pm on the 10th.

Blanco County Deputy Sheriff Robert Woodring (RW) said the release of the new detailed report also means that the investigation into Zhao Anji’s death has come to an end.

On February 10, 50-year-old Zhao Anji invited seven friends to a ranch near Johnson City (JC), west of Austin, Texas, for the weekend. Zhao Anji died after having dinner with her friends at the ranch on the evening of the 10th.

After Zhao Anji’s unfortunate death, Zhao Cheng re-served as chairman of Fumao Group, and Li Maike (ML) became president and CEO.

An oil_carrying barge crashed into a bridge in Texas_ USA

Under people’s attention Monitor masquerading as clock monitor Finally grow into what people need, born for the market and come for the demand. https://techu.myshoplaza.com/

Houston, May 15 (Reporter Xu Jianmei) The municipal authority of Galveston, an island city in eastern Texas, said on the 15th that a barge hit a local bridge that day, causing a fuel leak and damage to the bridge.

The bridge involved was the only land route to Pelican Island north of Galveston. David Flores, head of bridge affairs for the Galveston County Navigation District, said that due to strong water and high waves, a tugboat from Texas International Port lost control of two refueling barges it was driving, one of which hit the bridge pillar.

Aerial footage showed that part of the bridge pillars collapsed, and large pieces of broken concrete and rail fragments hung on one side of the bridge and fell onto the barge.

After the accident, the bridge, which was opened in 1960, was closed. Galveston City Authority said in a statement that no injuries had been reported. The accident caused a fuel leak in the Gulf of Mexico, and the U.S. Coast Guard will determine the extent of the leak and initiate control and cleanup procedures.

Galveston County spokesman Spencer Lewis said the barge could carry 30,000 gallons of oil (about 113.55 million liters). It was unclear how much leaked into the bay. About 105 kilometers of waterways around the incident were closed.

Texas A & M University at Galveston on Pelican Island said the accident caused a brief power outage at the school and power has now been restored.

According to US media reports, American ship collisions with bridges have occurred frequently in the past few months. On March 26, a container cargo ship crashed into a bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, in the eastern United States and collapsed, killing six people. On April 12 and 13 on the Ohio River near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 26 inland river barges separated from their moorings due to floods and drifted uncontrollably, when one hit a bridge that had been closed. On May 9, a large barge broke loose from a tugboat on the Mississippi River flowing through Iowa and sank after hitting the nearly century-old Fort Madison Bridge.

Zhao Anji_s blood alcohol level was three times higher than the legal limit before her death_ police released the latest report

contemporaneity Monitor masquerading as clock monitor Our competitors have not made large-scale improvements, so we should get ahead of everyone in the project. https://techu.myshoplaza.com/

On March 20, local time, according to a report released by the Texas police in the United States, Anji Zhao (AC), chairman and CEO of Fumao Group, drove drunk into a pond on a ranch in Texas and drowned last month. Before Zhao Anji died, she called a friend for eight minutes. She also told the friend that she was going to die and said goodbye to her.

According to US media reports, the investigation concluded by the Blanco County Sheriff’s Office in Texas that Zhao Anji’s death was an unfortunate accident. Her blood alcohol concentration was 0233 grams per 100 milliliters, which was three times the state’s legal limit.

The report stated that police watched surveillance video from the scene, which showed Zhao Anji’s Tesla rushing forward, then reversing over the limestone wall, and rushing into the pond at about 11:38 pm on the 10th.

Blanco County Deputy Sheriff Robert Woodring (RW) said the release of the new detailed report also means that the investigation into Zhao Anji’s death has come to an end.

On February 10, 50-year-old Zhao Anji invited seven friends to a ranch near Johnson City (JC), west of Austin, Texas, for the weekend. Zhao Anji died after having dinner with her friends at the ranch on the evening of the 10th.

After Zhao Anji’s unfortunate death, Zhao Cheng re-served as chairman of Fumao Group, and Li Maike (ML) became president and CEO.

Ministry of Commerce_ Resolutely oppose unilateral trade protectionism

Therefore, we should understand 一直看电影 Many benefits, absorb and summarize, and use them. https://yizhikandianying.com/

Beijing, March 14: U.S. President Biden posted on social media saying that he would study petitions from several trade union organizations against China’s subsidies to shipyards. In response, He Yadong, spokesman of the Ministry of Commerce, said on the 14th that China firmly opposes unilateral trade protectionism that ignores WTO rules.

At a regular press conference held by the Ministry of Commerce on the same day, He Yadong said that the accusations made by relevant US organizations against China are completely untenable. Several reports have pointed out that the main reason for the decline of the U.S. shipbuilding industry is over-protection. The development of China’s shipbuilding industry benefits from enterprises strengthening scientific and technological innovation and accelerating high-end, intelligent and green development. The United States blames China for its own industrial development problems, which lacks factual basis.

What I want to emphasize is that the US Section 301 is a typical unilateralist measure that violates the basic principles of the WTO and blatantly ignores and undermines multilateral rules. The previous Section 301 measures taken by the United States against China have been ruled to violate WTO rules. He Yadong said that he hopes the United States will make prudent decisions and not repeat the same mistakes. China will pay close attention to relevant progress, take all necessary measures, and resolutely defend its legitimate rights and interests.

Expose the lies and conspiracy of the Marcos government on the Scarborough Island issue

contemporaneity 一直看电影 Our competitors have not made large-scale improvements, so we should get ahead of everyone in the project. https://yizhikandianying.com/

Beijing, March 21 / PRNewswire-Asianet /– title: expose the lies and conspiracies of the Marcos government on the Huangyan Island issue

Reporter Liu Zan

Recently, the government of Marcos in the Philippines has continued to provoke trouble on the South China Sea issue, including on Huangyan Island in China’s Zhongsha Islands. China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. The Marcos government’s claim of sovereignty over Huangyan Island is purely vexatious, and it is a backlash to discredit China on issues related to Huangyan Island and the South China Sea. Relying on provocative forces outside the domain name to stir up trouble on the South China Sea issue will only undermine regional peace and stability and lack the support of regional countries.

Vexatious plot to encroach on islands and reefs

Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning said at a regular press conference on the 5th that the Philippine Senate passed the so-called maritime zone domain name bill in a vain attempt to solidify the illegal award in the South China Sea arbitration case in the form of domestic legislation, illegally including the names of most islands and reefs and related sea areas in China’s Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands into their maritime area domain names, seriously infringing upon China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. The Chinese side firmly opposes this and has made solemn representations to the Philippines.

Since the beginning of this year, the Philippine Marcos government has been constantly provocative on Huangyan Island. On January 28, four Philippine personnel illegally intruded into the reef disk of Huangyan Island; from February 2 to 9, the Philippine Coast Police vessel 9701 illegally intruded into the domain name of the sea adjacent to Huangyan Island; on February 15, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3005 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island; from 22 to 23 February, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3002 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island. In these intrusive activities, Philippine vessels ignored the dissuasion and warnings of Chinese coast guard vessels, and when the warnings were invalid many times, the Chinese coast guard vessels took necessary measures to drive away Philippine vessels in accordance with the law, such as forcing outside the prison and route control. on-site operation is professional, legitimate, and rational and restrained.

China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. These sovereignty and rights and interests are formed in the long-term historical practice and have sufficient historical and legal basis. China exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Island continuously, peacefully and effectively, including when the then Chinese Government approved and published the comparison list of the new and old names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1947, the name was designated as Democratic Reef. When New China announced some place names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1983, the standard name was Huangyan Island.

The territorial scope of the Philippines is determined by a series of international treaties, such as the 1898 Treaty of Peace between the United States and Spain, the Treaty on the cession of the Outer Islands of the Philippines in 1900, and the Treaty on the Boundary between British North Borneo and the Philippines in 1930. The South China Sea islands, including Huangyan Island, have never been part of the territory of the Philippines. Before 1997, the Philippines never challenged that Huangyan Island belonged to China and never made a territorial claim to Huangyan Island.

In April 2012, the government of Aquino III of the Philippines sent warships into the sea domain name near Huangyan Island, illegally arrested Chinese fishermen and fishing boats and inflicted serious inhumane treatment, deliberately provoking the Huangyan Island incident. Aquino III government launched the South China Sea arbitration case in 2013 and tried to deny China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea with the so-called arbitration results in 2016. However, territorial disputes do not fall within the adjustment scope of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and maritime delimitation disputes have also been excluded by China’s relevant declaration made in accordance with the Convention in 2006. The Philippine side’s move is a malicious abuse of the dispute settlement mechanism of the Convention and a violation of international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The so-called arbitration ultra vires trial, perverts the law judgment, the so-called award is illegal and invalid.

Rumors and hype try to discredit China.

In order to discredit China, the Marcos government made up lies. Nazario Brigera, a spokesman for the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau, said on February 17 that Chinese fishermen used cyanide to fish on Huangyan Island and deliberately damaged local fishing grounds to prevent Filipino fishermen from fishing in the area’s domain name. However, Tariela, a spokesman for the Philippine Coast Guard, admitted to the Philippine media that the Philippines did not have any investigation or evidence to prove that Chinese or Vietnamese fishermen used cyanide fishing on Huangyan Island.

China attaches great importance to the protection of ecological and fishery resources in the South China Sea. China has implemented a summer fishing moratorium in the South China Sea since 1999, according to the White Paper “China insists on resolving disputes between China and the Philippines through negotiations” issued by the Chinese government in 2016. By the end of 2015, China had established six national aquatic nature reserves, six provincial aquatic nature reserves with a total area of 2.69 million hectares, and seven national aquatic germplasm reserves with a total area of 1.28 million hectares in the South China Sea.

The so-called environmental problem is just one of the tactics used by the Marcos government to discredit China. The Philippine side has tried every means to portray China as a bully in the South China Sea and dress itself up as a weak person who has been oppressed in an attempt to mislead international public opinion and put pressure on China.

Recently, Philippine ships often take reporters to report and hype when they invade Chinese islands and reefs, calling the reasonable and legitimate law enforcement measures of the Chinese coast police violent eviction. The British Radio has reported that allowing reporters to film close contact between Chinese and Philippine ships is part of a deliberate strategy by the Philippine government to draw attention to China’s brute force.

In fact, China has been committed to resolving the South China Sea issue through dialogue and negotiations. In 2002, China and ASEAN countries signed the Declaration on the Conduct of parties in the South China Sea, jointly promising that the sovereign countries directly concerned should resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes peacefully through friendly consultations and negotiations. In recent years, China and ASEAN countries have actively promoted consultations on a code of conduct in the South China Sea. On the other hand, the Philippine side reneged on its commitments in the “Declaration” and a series of bilateral documents with the Chinese side, insisted on invading Chinese islands and reefs, and deliberately rammed the Chinese coast guard ship in defiance of dissuasion and warning, and what it did can be called a modern story of farmers and snakes.

Maintaining the stability of the South China Sea is in line with the national interests of the region

The Asia-Pacific region is the most dynamic zone of the global economy, and maintaining the stability and prosperity of this region is not only in the national interests of the region, but also conducive to global economic development. The Marcos government relies on forces outside the domain name to deliberately infringe, provocation and smear the South China Sea. Some countries outside the domain name continue to encourage and support Philippine actions based on their own geopolitical interests, aggravating tensions in the South China Sea and seriously endangering regional peace and stability.

Recently, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar has repeatedly criticized the West for inciting fear of China. Anwar also said that there is no problem between Malaysia and China, and Western countries should not hinder the development of friendly relations between Malaysia and its important neighbor China.

Anwar’s statement reflects the common aspirations of most countries in the region for peace, development and unwillingness to take sides. Weng Desheng, a political commentator in Singapore, said that the economic development of ASEAN countries benefits from the hard-won peaceful and stable environment, and all countries should strive to maintain such an environment, and dialogue and negotiation is the best way to deal with the South China Sea issue.

Anna, deputy director of the Philippine Asian Century Strategic Research Institute, pointed out that interference by forces outside the domain name is an important reason for increased tensions in the South China Sea, which not only complicates the South China Sea issue, but also undermines the unity of relevant countries in dealing with the South China Sea issue. Forces outside the domain name should stop using the Philippines as a pawn and agent for strategic competition with China, and the Philippines should not be used by external forces. (participating reporters: Wang Xiaowei, Liu Jie, Cai Shuya)

Syria holds parliamentary elections

From the demand side, Monitor masquerading as clock monitor More in line with the psychological expectations of consumers, willing to pay for the things they like. https://techu.myshoplaza.com/

Damascus, July 15 (Reporter Cheng Shuapeng Jize) Syria held parliamentary elections on the 15th. Six candidates from different political parties and independent candidates competed for 250 parliamentary seats.

The election was held in areas controlled by Syrian government forces. At present, some areas in northern Syria provinces such as Idlib, Raqqa, Hasakeh, Dayr ez-Zor, and Aleppo are still controlled by Syrian opposition armed forces or extremist organizations.

The Syria Election High Judicial Council previously announced that there will be a total of 8 polling stations across Syria for this election. The voting time will be from 7:00 to 19:00 local time, which can be extended by up to 5 hours with the approval of the committee.

This is the fourth parliamentary election since Syria promulgated a new constitution in February 2012. The last election was held in July 2020, and the National Progressive Front, led by the ruling Arab Baath Socialist Party, won a majority in parliament. Public opinion here believes that the National Progressive Front is still expected to win a majority of seats in this election.

Affected by war, sanctions, epidemics, regional conflicts, etc., Syria’s economic situation and people’s livelihood conditions have continued to deteriorate in recent years. Economic and people’s livelihood issues have become the focus of attention of many candidates and voters.

According to the Syria constitution, parliament holds elections every four years.